Review of Innovative Quality Indicators of Faculty in Institutions: A Study in Perspective of Students’ Performance
Keywords:
Competency, competitiveness, consistency in work, management institutions, quality focusAbstract
Generally, there is an immoderately competitive market. As of now, we do not just compete with the
surrounding networks but along with this, we need to compete globally also. So, for that, we need to
work with the base. As education gives confidence, enhance skill, and develop better leading
personality. So, for that, a learning and a creative environment must be required as in that students
learn from others, work in coordination, and develop themselves in a competitive global environment.
That is, we need to work on the quality of the students as they will be the future entrepreneurs and
professionals. Consistency in work is the key to success. So, it can be said that apart from their basic
academics, there is an imperative need for quality focus. The aim of the research paper is to analyze
or identify the correlation between innovative quality indicators of faculty and student performance.
The aim behind the research paper is to improve quality for teaching as education is the basis for the
future growth of students. So, this research focuses on what are the prime factors that affect the
quality of teaching are. For that, a probability sampling method under which simple random
sampling of 50 faculties is taken. To make it more reliable and justify the percentage method, a chi-
square test is used.
References
Alexander PA, Jetton TL. Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. Reading Online. 2000; 5(1): n1.
Kane T, Cantrell S. Gathering feedback for teaching. Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. 2012.
Kochar SK. Pivotal Issues in Indian Education. Sterling Publisher Pvt. Ltd.; 1981.
Kochar SK. Pivotal Issues in Indian Education. Sterling Publisher Pvt. Ltd.; 2017.
köller O. Classroom climate and contextual effects: Conceptual and methodological issues in the evaluation of group-level effects. Educational Psychologist. 2012.
Linda Hammond. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 2005; 13(42).
Rao VK. Trend in Education. Vol. III. Delhi: Rajat Publication; 1999.
Roberto Alvarez. The relationship between teacher quality and student achievement. New York; 2008.
Rosenshine B, Furst NF. The use of direct observation to study teaching. 2015.
Rouis S. Impacts of Facebook hedonic usage on students’ academic achievement: The role of culture and personality characteristics [Internet] [PhD dissertation] [Luleå]; 2012. (Doctoral thesis/Luleå University of Technology.
Mountford B, Rogers L. Using individual and group reflection in and on assessment as a tool for effective learning. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1996; 24: 1127–1134.
Yancey KB. Getting beyond exhaustion: Reflection, self-assessment, and learning. The Clearing House. Sep 1998; 72(1): 13–17.
Rostker BD. The evolution of the All-Volunteer Force. 2006.
Walter S Manroe. Teaching learning theory and Teacher Education 1890 to 1950. 1952.
