Employee Transfer and Promotion Influencing Job Satisfaction: A Study with Reference to APSPDCL, Chittoor District
Keywords:
APSPDCL, employee satisfaction, impact, promotion, transferAbstract
The present study investigates the impact of promotion and transfer on employee satisfaction, with special reference to APSPDCL (Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company). Every organization applies these procedures to improve the possibility of appointing people who have the required skills to flourish in their jobs. It is also vital that every company has a better promotion and transfer procedure. The process must include very transparent manner which is applicable to all the
job holders. In the case of a transfer, employees have to change workgroups, locations, or units. A promotion is a change in the designation’s position and level within the organization. The job satisfaction of the employee also depends on transfers and promotions. From the study, it is found that in the APSPDCL, employees are satisfied with the present procedure. Population of study was 200. Sample size is 50, and a random sampling method is employed in the present study. Few vital implications were derived from the study. The research result found that APSPDCL transfers and promotion impact on job satisfaction is positive.
References
Holton EF. III. The flawed four-level model. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 1996; 7(1): 5–20.
Noe RA, Schmitt N. The influence of trainee attitudes on training effectiveness: Test of a model. Personnel Psychology. 1986; 39: 497–523.
Sugrue B, Kim K. State of the industry report. Alexandria, VA: ASTD; 2004.
Kosteas VD. Job level changes and wage growth. International Journal of Manpower. 2009;30(3): 269–284.
Blau FD, De Varo J. New evidence on gender differences in promotion rates: An empirical analysis of a sample of new hires. Industrial Relations. 2007; 46(3): 511–550.
Cobb-Clark DA. Getting ahead: The determinants of and payoffs to internal promotion for young U.S. men and women. Polachek SW (ed). Worker Wellbeing in a Changing Labor Market. 2001; 20: 339–372. JAI Press, New York.
Francesconi M. Determinants and consequences of promotions in Britain. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 2001; 63(3): 279–310.
Pergamit MR, Veum JR. What is a promotion? Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 1999; 52(4): 581–601.
Hersch J, Viscusi WK. Gender differences in promotions and wages. Industrial Relations. 1996; 35(4): 461–472.
Clark AE. What really matters in a job? Hedonic measurement using quit data. Labour Economics. 2001; 8: 223–242.
Egan TM, Yang B, Barlett KR. The effects of organizational learning culture on motivation to transfer learning and turnover intention. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2004; 5(3): 279–301.
Kontoghiorghes C. Reconceptualizing the learning transfer conceptual framework: Empirical validation of a new systemic model. International Journal of Training and Development. 2004; 8(3): 210–221.
Intellectual Property: A power tool for economic growth [Online] Wipo.int. 2022 [cited 2022 Sep]. Available from: https://www.wipo.int/pressroom/en/prdocs/2003/wipo_pr_2003_337.html.
APSPDCL. [Online] Apspdcl.in. 2021 [cited 2022 Sep]. Available from: https://www.apspdcl.in/index.jsp.
