Biomimicry and Waste Management
Abstract
The rapid development of science and technology, as well as the growth of the population and the global problems require the study and solution of these problems through various methods, including many scientific disciplines or techniques. The increase in waste and the unsystematic depletion of natural resources requires new concepts and tools to create new environmentally friendly products. A new “circular economy” strategy is taking the place of the linear economy, which was founded on the “take, make, and discard” tenet. The circular economy seeks to lengthen product lifespans, cut waste, and manage natural resources sustainably. Biomimicry and cradle to cradle are two examples of circular economy trends or techniques. While cradle to cradle aims to reduce waste by utilizing nature's expertise, electronic technologies often attempt to solve problems by emulating natural processes. Understanding nature, its systems and cycles will provide comparisons and models for creating innovative solutions to global problems.
References
Ahadian S, Ostrovidov S, Hosseini V, Kaji H, Ramalingam M, Bae H, Khademhosseini A. Electrical stimulation as a biomimicry tool for regulating muscle cell behavior. Organogenesis. 2013;9 (2): 87–92.
Avdiushchenko A, Zając P. Circular economy indicators as a supporting tool for European regional development policies. Sustainability. 2019; 11 (11): 3025.
Bach V, Minkov N, Finkbeiner M. Assessing the ability of the Cradle to Cradle Certified™ Products Program to reliably determine the environmental performance of products. Sustainability. 2018; 10: 1562.
Bonciu F. The European economy: from a linear to a circular economy. Romanian J Eur Aff. 2014; 14 (4): 78–91.
Bruel A, Kronenberg J, Troussier N, Guillaume B. Linking industrial ecology and ecological economics: a theoretical and empirical foundation for the circular economy. J Indus Ecol. 2091; 23 (1): 12–21.
Braungart M, McDonough W, Bollinger A. Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions – a strategy for eco-effective product and system design. J Cleaner Prod. 2007; 15 (13–14): 1337–1348.
Eadie L, Ghosh TK. Biomimicry in textiles: past, present and potential. An overview. J R Soc Interface. 2011; 8 (59): 761-775.
Cattermole A. How the circular economy is changing fashion. AATCC Review. 2018; 18 (2): 37–42.
Das S, Shanmugam N, Kumar A, Jose S. Potential of biomimicry in the field of textile technology. Bioinspired Biomimetic Nanobiomater. 2017; 6 (4): 224–235. 10. Martin-Palma RJ, Lakhtakia A. Bioinspiration, Biomimetics, and Bioreplication 2013. Proceeding of the SPIE, San Diego, CA. 2013, March 11–13. London, UK: Elsevier; 2013.
Geissdoerfer M, Savaget P, Bocken NM, Hultink EJ. The circular economy – a new sustainability paradigm? J Cleaner Prod. 2017; 143: 757–768.
Ghisellini P, Cialani C, Ulgiati S. A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J Cleaner Prod. 2016; 114: 11–32.
Habib MK. Biomimetics: innovations and robotics. Int J Mechatron Manuf Syst. 2011; 4 (2): 113–134.
Kaiser B, Eagan PD, Shaner H. Solutions to health care waste: life-cycle thinking and “green” purchasing. Environ Health Perspect. 2001; 109 (3): 205–207.
Kennedy E, Fecheyr-Lippens D, Hsiung BK, Niewiarowski PH, Kolodziej M. Biomimicry: a path to sustainable innovation. Design Issues. 2015; 31 (3): 66–73.
