Impact of Risk Perception and Return Expectations on Mutual Fund Investment Preferences of Investors in Delhi NCR

Authors

  • Hina Sami
  • Syed Shujat Husain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37591/njfpm.v9i1.1773

Keywords:

Delhi NCR, investor behavior, mutual fund investment preferences, return expectations, risk perception

Abstract

Background: Mutual funds have become a primary choice for retail investors who wish to diversify their investments and have professional management of their funds. The decision of mutual funds investment is conventionally elucidated by risk–return trade-off; although, emerging evidence indicates that behavioral and contextual variables might moderate the role of the risk perception and return anticipations, especially in new markets like India. Aim: The purpose of the study is to check the influence of risk perception and expectation of returns on the investment preference in mutual funds by individual investors in Delhi NCR. Method: The descriptive and analytical research design was taken. The sample size was 100 primary datasets gathered in the form of a structured questionnaire filled in on a five–point Likert scale using a structured questionnaire on each of the 100 individual mutual fund investors in Delhi NCR. Simple linear regression, Pearson correlation analysis and descriptive statistics were the tools used to analyze the data with the assistance of the SPSS. Results: The results show that the mutual fund awareness, knowledge, and preferences of investments have weak and negative relationships with risk perception and return expectations. Nevertheless, the two variables were established as having no statistically significant effect on mutual fund investment preferences. Also, there was no significant correlation between investment experience and preference of investors. Conclusion: The research concludes that the preferences of investors in terms of mutual fund investment in the city of Delhi NCR is not significantly supported by the risk perception or return expectations alone. The findings indicate the significance of behavioral, informational, and contextualities in determining investment behavior, which implies the necessity of increased investor education and advice.

References

REFERENCES

Alhenawi Y. Financial literacy of US households: Knowledge vs. long–term financial planning.

Financ Serv Rev. 2013;22.

Arora S, Marwaha K. Variables influencing preferences for stocks (high risk investment) vis–à–vis

fixed deposits (low-risk investment): A comparative study. Int J Law Manag. 2014;56(4):333–343.

Banyen T. Behavioral drivers of stock market participation: Insights from Ghanaian investors. J

Bus Econ Options. 2022;5(2):1–13.

Barberis N, Thaler R. A survey of behavioral finance. Handb Econ Finance. 2003;1:1053–1128.

Cervellati EM, Angelini N, Stella GP. Behavioral finance and wealth management: Market

anomalies, investors’ behavior, and the role of financial advisors. 1st ed. City, Country: Publisher;

p. 1–250.

Gennaioli N, Shleifer A. A crisis of beliefs: Investor psychology and financial fragility. 1st ed.

Princeton (USA): Princeton University Press; 2018. p. 1–250.

Grable J, Lytton RH. Financial risk tolerance revisited: The development of a risk assessment

instrument. Financ Serv Rev. 1999;8(3):163–181.

Hoffmann AO, Post T, Pennings JM. How investor perceptions drive actual trading and risk-taking

behavior. J Behav Finance. 2015;16(1):94–103.

Jain N, Kesari B. The impact of behavioral biases on financial risk tolerance of investors and their

decision making. 2022.

Kumar MD, Kambuaya M, Jamil F, Muneer S. Determinants of the risk tolerance of individual

investors. Int J Econ Financ Issues. 2015;5(1):373–378.

Mahdzan NS, Zainudin R, Yoong SC. Investment literacy, risk tolerance and mutual fund

investments: An exploratory study of working adults in Kuala Lumpur. Int J Bus Soc.

;21(1):111–133.

Manideep MG, Chodisetty RC. Investor risk tolerance and its effect on mutual fund investment

decisions. 2022.

Nguyen LT, Gallery G, Newton C. The influence of financial risk tolerance on investment decision-

making in a financial advice context. Australas Account Bus Financ J. 2016;10(3).

Samuels JI. Enhancing investment management strategies: A comprehensive analysis of financial

instruments and risk mitigation techniques. 1st ed. City, Country: Publisher; 2024. p. 1–250.

Seetharaman A, Niranjan I, Patwa N, Kejriwal A. A study of the factors affecting the choice of

investment portfolio by individual investors in Singapore. Account Financ Res. 2017;6(3):153–168.

Shefrin H. Behavioral risk management: Managing the psychology that drives decisions and

influences operational risk. 1st ed. New York (USA): Palgrave Macmillan; 2016. p. 1–300.

Singh BK. A study on investors’ attitude towards mutual funds as an investment option. Int J Res

Manag. 2012;2(2):61–70.

Subramaniam BS, Lakshmi S, Krishnaprakash R, Singh P. Analyzing the dynamics of financial

advisory and planning in investment decisions. J Tech Educ. 2024;72.

Vasista K. Types and risks involved towards investing in mutual funds. Int J Curr Sci (IJCSPUB).

;12(1):2250–1770.

Weber EU, Blais AR, Betz NE. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale:

Published

2026-02-10

How to Cite

Sami, H., & Husain, S. S. . (2026). Impact of Risk Perception and Return Expectations on Mutual Fund Investment Preferences of Investors in Delhi NCR. NOLEGEIN-Journal of Financial Planning and Management, 9(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.37591/njfpm.v9i1.1773