Optimizing Enterprise Financial Risk Management: An Advanced Ensemble Machine Learning Framework for Transactional Fraud Mitigation and Business Continuity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37591/njbrm.v9i2.1954Keywords:
Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), Financial Risk Governance, Business Continuity Planning, Operational Risk Mitigation, Cyber-analytics, Fraud Exposure Assessment, Isolation Forest, Ensemble Learning, Cost-Sensitive Learning, Class ImbalanceAbstract
Transactional fraud represents a critical threat to enterprise risk management (ERM) and corporate governance, draining billions annually from global financial infrastructures. The Nasdaq Global Financial Crime Report estimates total fraud losses at $485.6 billion annually, with credit card fraud alone accounting for $28.6 billion. Managing this operational vulnerability is severely challenged by data asset asymmetry, where legitimate transactions dwarf fraudulent anomalies by a ratio exceeding 500:1. Standard classification models trained on such skewed data fail systematically, either ignoring fraud entirely or producing unacceptably high false-alarm rates that disrupt business operations. This study presents a robust predictive risk framework designed to safeguard business continuity and enhance corporate defense capabilities. Combining an unsupervised Isolation Forest anomaly metric with optimized machine learning ensemble layers (LightGBM, Random Forest, XGBoost), we introduce a highly interpretable risk assessment pipeline aligned with GRC mandates. To optimize business exposure controls, our architecture utilizes cost- sensitive learning weights that heavily penalize missed fraud over false alarms, reflecting the asymmetric operational cost structure facing financial institutions. Hyperparameter optimization via Optuna Bayesian search across 80 trials ensures the framework performs at the frontier of detection capability. A stacking meta-learner further consolidates base model outputs into a unified risk signal. Evaluated against 283,726 real-world transaction records from the European Credit Card Fraud Dataset, the proposed enterprise framework achieves 99.5% classification accuracy and 23.1% precision on imbalanced data streams, substantially outperforming current industry benchmarks. The LGBM+RF hybrid configuration achieves PR-AUC of 0.6729, exceeding the best published benchmark. Integrating boundary-focused ADASYN data synthesis yields an F1-risk capture score of 84.6%, nearly triple the performance of random undersampling under identical conditions. Cross-validation confirms stable generalization with mean F1 of 0.9523 across five folds. By providing clear algorithmic interpretability via SHAP feature attribution alongside high- precision mitigation, this framework serves as a scalable solution for corporate compliance, financial sector asset protection, and resilient business continuity systems.
References
1. Naman BM, Abdulazeez AM. Credit card fraud detection based on machine learning classification algorithm. Indones J Comput Sci. 2024;13(3). Available from: https://doi.org/10.33022/ijcs.v13i3.3996
2. Japkowicz N, Stephen S. The class imbalance problem: A systematic study. Intell Data Anal. 2002;6(5):429–449. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3233/ida-2002-6504
3. He H, Garcia EA. Learning from imbalanced data. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2009;21(9):1263– 1284. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2008.239
4. Akiba T, Sano S, Yanase T, Ohta T, Koyama M. Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework. Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/3292500.3330701
5. Dal Pozzolo A, Caelen O, Johnson RA, Bontempi G. Credit Card Fraud Detection Dataset. Kaggle. 2014. Available from: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mlg-ulb/creditcardfraud
6. Chawla N, Bowyer K, Hall L, Kegelmeyer W. SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res. 2002;16:321–357. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.953
7. Simaiya S, Lilhore UK, Sharma SK, Trivedi NK. An efficient credit card fraud detection model based on machine learning methods. Int J Adv Sci Technol. 2020;29(5):3414–3424.
8. Hajek P, Abedin M, Sivarajah U. Fraud detection in mobile payment systems using an XGBoost-based framework. Inf Syst Front. 2022;25(5):1985–2003. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10346-6
9. Carcillo F, Le Borgne YA, Caelen O, Kessaci Y, Oblé F, Bontempi G. Combining unsupervised and supervised learning in credit card fraud detection. Inf Sci. 2021;557:317–331. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.042
10. Ghosh S, Reilly DL. Credit card fraud detection with a neural-network. Proceedings of the Twenty- Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 1994;3:621–630. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.1994.323314
11. Khatri S, Arora A, Agrawal AP. Supervised machine learning algorithms for credit card fraud detection: A comparison. 2020 10th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Data Science & Engineering (Confluence). 2020:680–683. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/Confluence47617.2020.9057851
12. Mienye ID, Swart TG. A hybrid deep learning approach with generative adversarial network for credit card fraud detection. Technologies (Basel). 2024;12(10). Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.3390/technologies12100186
13. Maheshwari VC, Osman NA, Aziz N. A hybrid approach adopted for credit card fraud detection based on deep neural networks and attention mechanism. J Adv Res Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2023;32(1):315–331. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.32.1.315331
14. Alarfaj FK, Malik I, Khan HU, Almusallam N, Ramzan M, Ahmed M. Credit card fraud detection using state-of-the-art machine learning and deep learning algorithms. IEEE Access. 2022;10:39700–39715. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3166891
15. Varmedja D, Karanovic M, Sladojevic S, Arsenovic M, Anderla A. Credit card fraud detection— Machine learning methods. 18th International Symposium INFOTEH-JAHORINA. 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOTEH.2019.8717766
16. Talukder MA, Khalid M, Uddin MA. An integrated multistage ensemble machine learning model for fraudulent transaction detection. J Big Data. 2024;11(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537- 024-00996-5
17. Azim Mim M, Majadi N, Mazumder P. A soft voting ensemble learning approach for credit card fraud detection. Heliyon. 2024;10(3):e25466. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25466
18. Esenogho E, Mienye ID, Swart TG, Aruleba K, Obaido G. A neural network ensemble with feature engineering for improved credit card fraud detection. IEEE Access. 2022;10:16400–16407. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3148298
19. Panigrahi R, Borah S, Bhoi AK, Ijaz MF, Pramanik M, Kumar Y. A consolidated decision tree- based intrusion detection system for binary and multiclass imbalanced datasets. Mathematics. 2021;9(7):751. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/math9070751
20. Randhawa K, Loo CK, Seera M, Lim CP, Nandi AK. Credit card fraud detection using AdaBoost and majority voting. IEEE Access. 2018;6:14277–14284. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2806420
21. Makki S, Assaghir Z, Taher Y, Haque R, Hacid M-S, Zeineddine H. An experimental study with imbalanced classification approaches for credit card fraud detection. IEEE Access. 2019;7:93010– 93022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2927266
22.Mrozek P, Panneerselvam J, Bagdasar O. Efficient resampling for fraud detection during anonymised credit card transactions with unbalanced datasets. IEEE/ACM 13th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC). 2020:426–433. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/UCC48980.2020.00065
23. El Kafhali S, Tayebi M. XGBoost based solutions for detecting fraudulent credit card transactions. 2022 International Conference on Advanced Creative Networks and Intelligent Systems (ICACNIS). 2022:1–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACNIS57039.2022.10054965
24. Padhi DK, Padhy N, Bhoi AK, Shafi J, Ijaz MF. A fusion framework for forecasting financial market direction using enhanced ensemble models and technical indicators. Mathematics. 2021;9(21):2646. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/math9212646
25. Xia Y, Zhao J, He L, Li Y, Niu M. A novel tree-based dynamic heterogeneous ensemble method for credit scoring. Expert Syst Appl. 2020;159:113615. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113615
26. Yotsawat W, Wattuya P, Srivihok A. A novel method for credit scoring based on cost-sensitive neural network ensemble. IEEE Access. 2021;9:78521–78537. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3083963
27. Dal Pozzolo A, Boracchi G, Caelen O, Alippi C, Bontempi G. Credit card fraud detection: A realistic modeling and a novel learning strategy. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2017;29(8):3784–3797. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2736643
28. Lundberg SM, Lee SI. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2017;30.
29. Xuan S, Liu G, Li Z, Zheng L, Wang S, Jiang C. Random forest for credit card fraud detection. 2018 IEEE 15th International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC). 2018:1– 6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/icnsc.2018.8361343
30. Taha AA, Malebary SJ. An intelligent approach to credit card fraud detection using an optimized light gradient boosting machine. IEEE Access. 2020;8:25579–25587. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2971354
31. Alfaiz NS, Fati SM. Enhanced credit card fraud detection model using machine learning. Electronics. 2022;11(4):662. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11040662
32. Mienye ID, Sun Y. Performance analysis of cost-sensitive learning methods with application to imbalanced medical data. Inform Med Unlocked. 2021;25:100690. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imu.2021.100690
33. Wang Y. A data balancing and ensemble learning approach for credit card fraud detection. 2025 4th International Symposium on Computer Applications and Information Technology (ISCAIT). 2025:386–390. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAIT64916.2025.11010591
34. Reddy VVK, Reddy RVK, Munaga MSK, Karnam B, Maddila SK, Kolli CS. Deep learning-based credit card fraud detection in federated learning. Expert Syst Appl. 2024;255:124493. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124493
35. Breskuviene D, Dzemyda G. Enhancing credit card fraud detection: Highly imbalanced data case. J Big Data. 2024;11(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-024-01059-5
36. Van Vlasselaer V, Bravo C, Caelen O, Eliassi-Rad T, Akoglu L, Snoeck M, et al. APATE: A novel approach for automated credit card transaction fraud detection using network-based extensions. Decis Support Syst. 2015;75:38–48. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.04.013
37. Nandi AK, Randhawa KK, Chua HS, Seera M, Lim CP. Credit card fraud detection using a hierarchical behaviour-knowledge space model. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(1):e0260579. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260579
38. Johnson JM, Khoshgoftaar TM. Survey on deep learning with class imbalance. J Big Data. 2019;6(1):1–54. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0192-5
