Digital-Transformation Pathways for Sustainable Enterprises:Sectoral Evidence and the Integration of ESG Factors
Keywords:
Digital Transformation; ESG Performance; Sustainability; Green Innovation; SMEs; Generative AI; Resource OrchestrationAbstract
This study examines how digital transformation enables sustainable enterprise development through the integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors across diverse sectors. Drawing on evidence from manufacturing SMEs, Chinese listed firms, and underserved markets in the United States, the research develops a comprehensive understanding of the digital–sustainability nexus. Anchored in Resource-Based View, Dynamic Capabilities Theory, and Resource Orchestration Theory, the study highlights how digital technologies act as strategic enablers that enhance organisational capabilities and resource utilisation. The findings reveal that digital transformation significantly improves ESG performance and firm value, particularly when supported by green innovation, sterilization, and generative artificial intelligence. Integrated digital platforms generate synergistic benefits, allowing firms to achieve greater outcomes than isolated technological adoption. However, the effectiveness of these pathways is contingent upon contextual factors such as digital maturity, ownership structure, geographic location, and managerial expertise. The study also identifies innovation capabilities as a key mediating mechanism, while sterilization plays a complementary but less dominant role. Despite these advantages, barriers including financial constraints, digital literacy gaps, and infrastructural limitations continue to hinder adoption, especially among SMEs. The research underscores the need for policy interventions such as digital subsidies, ESG standardisation, and institutional support systems to bridge these gaps. Overall, the study contributes to the growing literature by demonstrating that digital transformation, when strategically aligned with ESG objectives, can drive sustainable competitiveness and inclusive economic growth.
References
1. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.
2. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482.
3. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017). The business of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review, 95(4), 3–11.
4. Cagiza, C., Faustino, M., Cagiza, I., & Cajiza, A. (2025). AI-powered advisory platforms for sustainable marketing innovation in SMEs. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202509.0113.v1
5. Chen, D., & Wang, S. (2024). Digital transformation, innovation capabilities, and servitization as ESG drivers. Scientific Reports, 14.
6. Cheng, R., Ho, C.-Y., & Huang, S. (2023). Digitalization and firm performance. Applied Economics Letters, 30, 2401–2406.
7. Cui, J. (2025). Digital innovation's impact on corporate ESG performance: The mediating role of GAI. arXiv.
8. Efeni, O. S., et al. (2026). Digital transformation and circular economy integration. Ecological Civilization, 3(1), 10019.
9. Flammer, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 758–781.
10. Ge, Q. (2025). Digital transformation and corporate ESG performance: Information disclosure mechanisms. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 192, 58–70.
11. George, G., Merrill, R. K., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. (2020). Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(6), 990–1000.
12. Gupta, S., et al. (2019). Circular economy and big data analytics: A stakeholder perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 466–474.
13. Hanelt, A., Firk, S., Hildebrandt, B., & Kolbe, L. M. (2021). Digital M&A, digital innovation, and firm performance. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(1), 3–26.
14. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.
15. Li, K., & Sutunyarak, C. (2024). ESG, digital transformation and firm value in China. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(8).
16. Loebbecke, C., & Picot, A. (2015). Reflections on societal and business model transformation from digitalization. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(3), 149–157.
17. Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390–1412.
18. Teece, D. J. (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 328–352.
19. Usha, I., & Thamotharan, A. (2025). Revisiting ESG integration and firm performance in the digital era. Advances in Consumer Research, 2(5), 1840–1850.
20. Wedel, M., & Kannan, P. K. (2016). Marketing analytics for data-rich environments. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 97–121.
21. Yin, N. (2025). Digital transformation and corporate ESG performance through the prism of executive experience. Polish Journal of E
