Examining The Ethical disparity of AI adoption and social reality
Abstract
AI is the latest discussion today.it has conquered all over the world with its functionality. AI or artificial intelligence is a computer innovation which outperform all man-like activities efficiently and effectively than humans. It is applied in almost every sector and even in our daily routine. However, this has a questionable impact on human welfare. AI developers should ensure good and fair practice of it. Most of the reviews collected suggest that over dependence on AI brings negative development in society. The focus of this paper is to identify the social and ethical concerns of AI on the society and how it affects human life and creativity. this study follows descriptive type of research. Samples are collected from area of Coimbatore city. This paper summarizes and critically evaluate the social impact of AI and related technological innovations. Deeper analysis of social settings after AI is necessary for the sound regulation of these technologies. Given its expanding population, increasing levels of digital awareness, and the growing implementation of AI-driven solutions in both public institutions and private enterprises, Coimbatore offers a meaningful backdrop for exploring public attitudes and social transformations brought about by AI. Limiting the scope to this district enables the collection of focused, region-specific insights, allowing for a nuanced understanding of how AI influences daily life, societal structures, and workplace dynamics. Additionally, this localized approach facilitates a more in-depth assessment of the particular ethical and social issues that arise in a semi-urban Indian environment. The findings from Coimbatore may also provide valuable guidance for other regions across India that are undergoing similar technological changes.
References
Fernandes PM, Santos FC, Lopes M. Norms for beneficial AI: A computational analysis of the societal value alignment problem. AI Communications. 2020 Dec 18;33(3-6):155-71.
Bird, S., Barocas, S., Crawford, K., Diaz, F., & Wallach, H. (2016, October). Exploring or exploiting? Social and ethical implications of autonomous experimentation in AI. In Workshop on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Machine Learning.
Sætra HS, Fosch-Villaronga E. Research in AI has Implications for Society: How do we Respond?. Morals & Machines. 2021 May 31;1(1):60-73.
Ahmad, S. F., Han, H., Alam, M. M., Rehmat, M., Irshad, M., Arraño-Muñoz, M., & Ariza-Montes, A. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence on human loss in decision making, laziness and safety in education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-14.
Benjamins, V. R., & Salazar García, I. (2019). Towards a framework for understanding societal and ethical implications of Artificial Intelligence. Towards a framework for understanding societal and ethical implications of Artificial Intelligence, 89-100.
Whittlestone, J., Nyrup, R., Alexandrova, A., Dihal, K., & Cave, S. (2019). Ethical and societal implications of algorithms, data, and artificial intelligence: a roadmap for research. London: Nuffield Foundation.
Cubric, M. (2020). Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: A tertiary study. Technology in Society, 62, 101257.
Hagerty, A., & Rubinov, I. (2019). Global AI ethics: a review of the social impacts and ethical implications of artificial intelligence. arXiv p, sharXiv:1907.07892.
Clark J, Shoham Y, Perrault R, Erik Brynjolfsson, Manyika J niebles JC, lyons T, Etchemendy j grosz B and Bauer Z (2018) the AI index 2018 annual report, AI steering committee, human- Centered AI initiative, Stanford university, Stanford , CA
Köbis L, Mehner C (2021) Ethical questions raised by AI-supported mentoring in higher education. Front Artif Intell 4:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021. 624050
Sarwat (2018) Is AI making humans lazy? Here’s what UAE residents say. Khaleej Times. https://www.khaleejtimes.com/nation/dubai/Is-AI-making-humanslazy-Here-what-UAE-residents-say
Weyerer J, Langer P (2019) Garbage in, garbage out: the vicious cycle of ai-based discrimination in the public sector. In: 20th Annual international conference on digital government research. ACM Digital Library, pp. 509–511.
Kamenskih A(2022) The analysis of security and privacy risks in smart education environments. J Smart Cities Soc 1(1):17–29. https://doi.org/10.3233/SCS210114.
Vazhayil A, Shetty R (2019) Focusing on teacher education to introduce AI in schools: perspectives and illustrative findings. In: 2019 IEEE 10th international conference on Technology for Education (T4E). IEEE, Goa, https://doi. org/10.1109/T4E.2019.00021.
Pomerol J-C (1997) Artificial intelligence and human decision making. Eur J Oper Res 99(1):3–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(96)00378-5.
Duan Y, Edwards JS, Dwivedi YK (2019) Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data—evolution, challenges and research agenda. Int J Inf Manag 48:63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021
Cukurova M, Kent C, Luckin R (2019) Artificial intelligence and multimodal data in the service of human decision‐making: a case study in debate tutoring. Br J Educ Technol 50(6):3032–3046. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12829
Ho M-T, Mantello P, Ghotbi N, Nguyen M-H, Nguyen H-KT, Vuong Q-H (2022) Rethinking technological acceptance in the age of emotional AI: surveying Gen Z (Zoomer) attitudes toward non-conscious data collection. Technol Soc 70(102011):102011.
Shrestha YR, Ben-Menahem SM, von Krogh G(2019) Organizational DecisionMaking Structures in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. California Manag Rev 61(4):66–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619862257.
Hair Jr JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2013) Partial least squares structural equation modeling: rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Plan 46(1–2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.
