Digital Payment Adoption in India: A UTAUT2-Based Analysis of Facilitators and Inhibitors

Authors

  • Isha Gupta Assistant Professor, Department of Management, RDIAS Rukmini Devi Institute of Advanced Studies 2A & 2B, Phase- 1, Madhuban Chowk, Outer Ring Road, Rohini, Delhi, India
Published 2026-03-28
Section Research Paper
AccessSubscription

Keywords:

Digital payments UTAUT2 PLS-SEM behavioral intention perceived risk technology adoption

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital payment systems in India has created a paradox characterized by extensive technological availability alongside uneven user adoption. Although digital payments offer significant advantages, such as convenience, speed, transparency, and enhanced financial inclusion, behavioral resistance continues to limit their widespread acceptance. Concerns related to usability, trust, and perceived value often influence individuals’ decisions to adopt such technologies. In this
context, the present study extends the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) framework by incorporating both facilitating and inhibiting factors that shape behavioral intention to adopt digital payments in the National Capital Region (NCR), India. A cross-sectional research design was employed, and primary data were collected from 278 valid respondents. The proposed research model was analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to examine the hypothesized relationships among constructs. The empirical findings reveal that performance expectancy (β = 0.455, p < 0.01), effort expectancy (β = 0.161, p < 0.05), and hedonic motivation (β =0.245, p < 0.001) significantly and positively influence behavioral intention, collectively explaining 31.5% of the variance. Conversely, habit and perceived risk were found to have no statistically significant impact in this context. The study offers valuable theoretical enrichment of UTAUT2 and provides practical insights for policymakers, financial institutions, and fintech service providers aiming to strengthen digital payment adoption strategies in emerging economies.

References

  1. Baptista, G., & Oliveira, T. (2015). Understanding mobile banking: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology combined with cultural moderators. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 418-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.024
  2. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295-336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  3. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  4. Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. *International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59*(4), 451- 474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00011-3
  5. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1),39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 6. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
  6. Gupta, A., Dogra, N., & George, B. (2018). What determines tourist adoption of smartphone apps? An analysis based on the UTAUT-2 framework. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 9(1), 50-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-02-2017-0013
  7. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLSSEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  8. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014- 0403-8
  9. Kim, H. W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile internet: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009
  10. Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G., & Cheung, C. M. (2007). How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 705-737. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148817
  11. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  12. Pal, A., De', R., & Herath, T. (2020). The role of mobile payment technology in sustainable and human-centric development: Evidence from Bangladesh. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(3), 605-625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09969-z
  13. Patil, P. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2020). Digital payments adoption: An analysis of literature. In N. P. Rana, E. L. Slade, G. P. Sahu, H. Kizgin, N. Singh, B. Dey, A. Gutierrez, & Y. K. Dwivedi (Eds.), Digital and social media marketing: Emerging applications and theoretical development (pp. 61-76). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24374-6_5
  14. Reserve Bank of India. (2023). *Annual report 2022-23*. https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/AnnualReportPublications.aspx?year=2023
  15. Shaw, N., & Sergueeva, K. (2019). The non-monetary benefits of mobile commerce: Extending UTAUT2 with perceived value. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.024
  16. Singh, N., Srivastava, S., & Sinha, N. (2020). Perceived risk and online purchase intention: A study across product categories. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101947
  17. Slade, E. L., Williams, M. D., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Piercy, N. C. (2015). Exploring consumer adoption of proximity mobile payments. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 23(3), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2014.914075
  18. Talwar, S., Dhir, A., Khalil, A., Mohan, G., & Islam, A. N. (2020). Point of adoption and beyond: Initial trust and mobile-payment continuation intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102086
  19. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  20. World Bank. (2022). *Global financial development report 2022: COVID-19 and financial inclusion*. World Bank Publications.

Published

2026-03-28

How to Cite

Digital Payment Adoption in India: A UTAUT2-Based Analysis of Facilitators and Inhibitors. (2026). NOLEGEIN- Journal of Entrepreneurship Planning, Development and Management, 9(1). https://mbajournals.in/index.php/JoEPDM/article/view/1808

Similar Articles

21-30 of 60

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.