Victim Compensation and Support Service in India, USA, and UK

Authors

  • Saquib Ahmed
  • Bhupinder Singh
  • Anjali Raghav
  • Sahil Lal
  • Manmeet Kaur Arora

Abstract

The victim support and compensation systems in India, the United States, and the United Kingdom are compared in this article. It draws attention to each nation's legal systems and procedures, emphasizing how they meet the needs of victims of crime. Victim compensation programs are well-established in the United States and the United Kingdom, providing both comprehensive financial support and other support services including legal aid and counselling. On the other hand, despite their progress, India's victim compensation programs still face obstacles like uneven funding and low victim knowledge. The paper highlights the necessity for India to bring its policies into compliance with international norms while examining significant variations in the reach and effectiveness of these programs. It also looks at how Indian legal services authorities, including the District Legal Services Authority (DLSA), help victims by offering support and compensation. The study concludes with reform suggestions to enhance victim support services in India. In order to guarantee a more victim-centric approach, the report also examines worldwide best practices and the necessity for India to harmonize its regulations with international norms. The main distinctions between these three nations' victim support systems in terms of their reach, efficacy, and scope are examined critically. In order to strengthen India's victim support infrastructure, the study ends with reform recommendations. These include the need for more funding, more efficient administrative procedures, easier access to legal aid, and more awareness-raising campaigns to encourage victims to seek support and justice.

References

Sirohi p, malik ns. Victim impact statement: comparative analysis of the indian criminal justice system with western countries specific reference to usa, canada, uk, and australia.

Janjua lr, ahmed s, singh b. Prospects and challenges of artificial intelligence in forest protection. Machine learning and internet of things in fire ecology. 2025:231-46.

Singh b, arora mk, lal s, raghav a, ahmad s. Capital gains and cost allocation: tax challenges in indian demergers. National journal of real estate law. 2025;8(1):1-5.

Ahmed s, singh b. Gender equality in the workplace: a comparative analysis of maternity and parental leave laws. Journal of family & adoption law. 2025 feb 1;8(1):22-6.

Middha m, kedia b, bhattacharya b. Compensatory jurisprudence in india: a step forward to rehabilitate the victims of various acts and crimes. International journal for the semiotics of law-revue internationale de sémiotique juridique. 2023 jun;36(3):1311-23.

Yadav m, singh thakur p, rastogi p. Compensation and rehabilitation of rape survivors a constitutional right. Journal of indian academy of forensic medicine. 2014 sep;36(3):284-91.

Kanungo e, chattoraj p. Award of compensation as a mode of victim restoration: a comparative analysis of laws in india, new zealand and germany. International journal of criminal justice sciences. 2020 jul 1;15(2):325-42.

Miers D. Offender and state compensation for victims of crime: Two decades of development and change. International Review of Victimology. 2014 Jan;20(1):145-68.

Chakraborty S. An approach to support services for victims of crime in India with an emphasis on situation like Covid-19. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry. 2021 Mar 1;12(3).

Deshmukh A. Victim Rights in Indian Criminal Justice System: A Comparative Study. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2020;11(2):157-63.

Published

2024-11-25

How to Cite

Saquib Ahmed, Bhupinder Singh, Anjali Raghav, Sahil Lal, & Manmeet Kaur Arora. (2024). Victim Compensation and Support Service in India, USA, and UK. NOLEGEIN-Journal of Corporate &Amp; Business Laws, 8(1), 26–34. Retrieved from https://mbajournals.in/index.php/JoCBL/article/view/1614