Understanding of Bloom’s Taxonomy through Outcomes of the Examination in ERP System

Authors

  • B.K.S.S. Pattanaik Pattanaik
  • P. Khandelwal

Keywords:

ERP system, Bloom Taxonomy, planning, management, Centralized Environment

Abstract

The present article considers the results of computer science students of one of the private university in Odisha through which one can realise the improvements of blooms taxonomy. The inclusions of bloom taxonomy in enterprise resource planning would enhance or improve the quality of education. Moreover, there are six type of parameters such as remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating and creating have been considered. Here 4 different computer science papers have been realised through the setting of the question papers from all these six categories. Finally, the results of these six parameters have disclosed through result analysis. Apart from this, the Average enrolled for module, Average admitted to the examination, Male to female Percentage and Examination Pass rate have been discussed. Finally, a representation of through bar graph is indicated. The quality education would be realised if the aforementioned parameters could include in the enterprise resource planning system

References

Bahar Yelken ERP System Implementation: A C Beko A.Ġ. Ġstanbul Kültür University Faculty of Engineering & Architecture, Department of Industrial Engineering. 2005.

University of South Africa, http://www.unisa.ac.za/ default.html, Accessed 11 March 2013.

International Engineering Alliance, http://www.ieagreements.org/, Accessed 5 October 2012.

International Engineering Alliance, Graduate Attributes and Professional Competencies: IEA, 2009.

T. Sutherland, N. McFarlane and J. Vermeulen, The Implementation of an Introductory Technology and Skills Enhancement Course For Prospective Engineering Students, CREE For Engineering Educators, 6(1), 2002, pp. 20–23.

G. Sutherland, A curriculum framework for an introductory programme in the national diploma: engineering at the Vaal University of Technology, Higher Education Studies: University of Stellenbosch, 2009.

A.J. Swart, Evaluation of Final Examination Papers in Engineering: A Case Study Using Bloom’s Taxonomy, IEEE Transactions on Education, 53(2), 2010, pp. 257–264.

.J.C. Cain, Continuing medical education, The Journal of the AmericanMedical Association, 242(11), 1979, pp. 1145–1146.

M. Feller, Open-book testing and education for the future, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20(2), 1994, pp. 235–238.

S. R. Smith, Is it time to close the book on closed-book examinations? Medicine and Health, Rhode Island, 82(8), 1999, pp. 285–288.

R. Moore and P. A. Jensen, Do open-book exams impede long-term learning in introductory biology courses? Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(7), 2007, pp. 46–49.

D. Carrier, Legislation as a stimulus to innovation, Higher Education Management, 2(1), 1990, pp. 88–98.

M. A. McDaniel, H. L. Roediger and K. B. McDermott, Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 2007, pp. 200–206.

Arthur James Swart; Evaluation of Final Examination Papers in Engineering: A Case Study Using Bloom’s Taxonomy; IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, VOL. 53, NO. 2, MAY 2010

Published

2022-06-02

How to Cite

Pattanaik, B. P., & Khandelwal, P. . (2022). Understanding of Bloom’s Taxonomy through Outcomes of the Examination in ERP System. NOLEGEIN- Journal of Entrepreneurship Planning, Development and Management, 5(1). Retrieved from https://mbajournals.in/index.php/JoEPDM/article/view/870