ESG Performance as a Non-Financial Determinant of Corporate Borrowing Cost: Evidence from Indian Listed Companies (2020–2025)
Keywords:
ESG, cost of debt, borrowing cost, sustainable finance, India, instrumental variables, BRSR mandate, causal inferenceAbstract
This study examines the influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance on corporate borrowing costs among Indian listed companies during the period 2020–2025. Using a balanced panel dataset of 50 firms across multiple sectors, the research investigates whether stronger ESG practices contribute to lower debt financing costs in an emerging market setting. The study employs advanced econometric techniques, including fixed- effects regression, instrumental variable estimation, and difference-in-differences analysis centered on the implementation of SEBI’s Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) mandate. The findings reveal a significant inverse relationship between ESG performance and borrowing costs, indicating that firms with higher ESG scores benefit from reduced financing expenses. A one-standard-deviation increase in ESG performance is associated with a reduction of approximately 42–58 basis points in borrowing costs. Among the ESG dimensions, governance demonstrates the strongest impact, followed by environmental and social factors. The results remain robust across alternative ESG measures, sub-period estimations, propensity score matching, and additional sensitivity tests. The study further highlights that the BRSR mandate strengthened the ESG–debt pricing relationship by improving disclosure quality and reducing information asymmetry between firms and lenders. These findings contribute to the sustainable finance literature by providing causal evidence from the Indian context and offer important implications for policymakers, financial institutions, and corporate managers in designing ESG-linked financing strategies and regulatory frameworks.
References
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Stellner, C., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and Eurozone corporate bonds: The moderating role of country sustainability. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.06.011
Giese, G., Lee, L.-E., Melas, D., Nagy, Z., & Nishikawa, L. (2019). Foundations of ESG investing: How ESG affects equity valuation, risk, and performance. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(5), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2019.45.5.069
Securities and Exchange Board of India. (2021). Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR). SEBI Circular No. SEBI/HO/CFD/CMD-2/P/CIR/2021/562. https://www.sebi.gov.in
Deb, S., Guo, X., & Wu, Y. (2022). The influence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices on US firms' performance: Evidence from the coronavirus crisis. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article 1002331. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1002331
Rani, S., Kumar, R., & Singh, R. (2025). When ESG meets uncertainty: Financing cost effects under regulatory fragmentation and rating divergence. Systems, 13(6), 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13060465
Chava, S. (2014). Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Management Science, 60(9), 2223–2247. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1863
Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1794–1810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002
Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2017). On the foundations of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Finance, 72(2), 853–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12487
Gupta, R. (2026). Sectoral variations in ESG performance: A comparative analysis of environmental, social, and governance scores of selected Indian companies. International Journal of Financial Management and Research, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2026.v08i01.66788
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
Bauer, R., & Hann, D. (2010). Corporate environmental management and credit risk. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1660470
Apergis, N., Poufinas, T., & Choustani, E. (2022). ESG ratings and cost of debt. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101744
Christensen, D. M., Serafeim, G., & Sikochi, A. (2022). Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. The Accounting Review, 97(1), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-0506
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
