Role of Greenwashing in Shaping Consumer Perception and Brand Image in Sustainable Marketing
Keywords:
Greenwashing, Consumer Perception, Brand Image, Sustainable Marketing, Consumer BehaviourAbstract
In the contemporary marketing landscape, sustainability has emerged as a critical determinant of consumer choice and brand positioning. Organizations increasingly adopt eco-friendly practices to appeal to environmentally conscious consumers; however, the rise of misleading environmental claims, commonly termed greenwashing, has raised significant concerns. This study investigates the role of greenwashing in shaping consumer perception and brand image within the domain of sustainable marketing. Primary data were collected from 100 respondents aged 18–35 years using a structured questionnaire, and analyzed through descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression techniques.The findings reveal that while sustainability claims positively influence consumer decision-making, perceived greenwashing significantly undermines trust, leading to negative consumer perception and deterioration of brand image. Consumers exhibit higher skepticism toward brands that lack transparency, which ultimately affects their purchase intentions. Conversely, authentic and verifiable sustainability practices enhance brand credibility, strengthen consumer trust, and improve long-term brand equity. The study further highlights that increasing consumer awareness regarding environmental issues has made individuals more critical of marketing claims, thereby amplifying the consequences of deceptive practices. These insights emphasize the necessity for organizations to adopt transparent, ethical, and evidence-based sustainability communication strategies. Overall, the research contributes to understanding the complex relationship between greenwashing, consumer perception, and brand image, and underscores the importance of authenticity in fostering sustainable consumer- brand relationships.
References
1. Delmas MA, Burbano VC. The drivers of greenwashing. Calif Manage Rev. 2011;54(1):64–87.
2. Chen YS, Chang CH. Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. J Bus Ethics. 2013;114(3):489–500.
3. Nyilasy G, Gangadharbatla H, Paladino A. Perceived greenwashing: The interactive effects of green advertising and corporate environmental performance. J Bus Ethics. 2014;125(4):693–707.
4. Lyon TP, Montgomery AW. The means and end of greenwash. Organ Environ. 2015;28(2):223– 249.
5. Parguel B, Benoît-Moreau F, Larceneux F. How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. J Bus Ethics. 2011;102(1):15–28.
6. Seele P, Gatti L. Greenwashing revisited: In search of a typology and accusation-based definition incorporating legitimacy strategies. Bus Strateg Environ. 2017;26(2):239–252.
7. Aji HM, Sutikno B. The extended consequence of greenwashing: Perceived consumer skepticism. Int J Bus Inf. 2015;10(4):433–468.
8. Braga Junior SS, Martínez MP, Correa CM. Greenwashing effect, attitudes, and beliefs in green consumption. RAUSP Manag J. 2019;54(2):226–241.
9. Akturan U. How does greenwashing affect green branding equity and purchase intention? Mark Intell Plan. 2018;36(7):809–824.
10. Haws KL, Winterich KP, Naylor RW. Seeing the world through green-tinted glasses. J Consum Psychol. 2014;24(3):336–354.
11. Keller KL. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. J Mark. 1993;57(1):1–22.
12. Kotler P, Keller KL. Marketing management. 15th ed. Pearson Education; 2016.
13. Schiffman LG, Wisenblit J. Consumer behavior. 12th ed. Pearson; 2019.
14. Solomon MR. Consumer behavior: Buying, having, and being. 12th ed. Pearson; 2018.
15. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211.
16. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley; 1975.
17. Chen YS. The drivers of green brand equity. J Bus Ethics. 2010;93(2):307–319.
18. Rahbar E, Wahid NA. Investigation of green marketing tools’ effect on consumers’ purchase behavior. Bus Strateg Ser. 2011;12(2):73–83.
19. Leonidou CN, Skarmeas D. Gray shades of green: Causes and consequences of green skepticism. J Bus Ethics. 2017;144(2):401–415.
20. Paul J, Modi A, Patel J. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior. J Retail Consum Serv. 2016;29:123–134.
