Standardizing Public Infrastructure Procurement: A Best Practice Trajectory for Nigerian Quantity Surveyors
Keywords:
Best Practice, Infrastructure, Public Procurement, Quantity SurveyorsAbstract
The current global drive in public procurement is aimed at improving efficiency, cost- effectiveness, and the overall value delivered by procurement processes This paper spotlights and raises discussions on the interesting opportunities for Nigerian Quantity Surveyors to harness the benefits of procurement best practices such as of Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Sustainable Procurement, as is the case with most public procurement entities in other countries. Adopting best practices such as Sustainability and Life Cycle Costing in public procurement will ensure best value for money that deliver long-term benefits. This paper x-rays how Quantity surveyors can play front-line roles in the drive to standardize Nigeria’s public procurement, via the advocacy for the Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) to exercise more stringent regulatory powers, mandating public procurement entities to effectively integrate relevant best practices that are changing the procurement paradigm globally. The study submits that irrespective of the BPPs effort to include sustainability in public procurement guidelines, no specific detailing on sustainable procurement is outlined in the guidelines, given the significant global dimensions of the issue. The directives on sustainable procurement are limited to the drafting of technical specifications, without explicitly highlighting the sustainable procurement functions at the execution phase, where the professional roles becomes even more hands-on. This clear shortcoming should be rectified in future updates of the BPP guidelines to ensure that all parties are held responsible and that the sustainability objectives of the project remain fully protected and uncompromised. Furthermore, Nigeria’s Public Procurement regulations should consistently promote LCC approach, and set out a robust methodological framework for taking life-cycle costs into account in the various stages of public procurement process. There is thus room for redefining the BPP guidelines, with respect to the application of LCC principles, necessary to support the building of long term collaborative relationships between procurement entities and the supply chain, in tandem with emerging global best practices.
References
Adjei‐Bamfo, P., Djajadikerta, H. G., Jie, F., Brown, K., & Kiani Mavi, R. (2022). Public procurement for innovation through supplier firms' sustainability lens: A systematic review and research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1–21.
Ahmed, N. U. (1995). A design and implementation model for life cycle cost management system. Information & Management, 28, 261–269.
Asiedu, Y., & Gu, P. (1998). Product life cycle cost analysis: State of the art review. International Journal of Production Research, 36(4), 883–908.
Cox, A. (2001). Understanding Buyer and Supplier Power: A Framework for Procurement and Supply Competence. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37(1), 8–15.
Directive 2009/33/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles.
Directive 2004/18/EC on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, 31 March 2004.
Directive 2014/24/EU on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, 26 February 2014.
Ellram, L. M. (1995). Total cost of ownership. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 25(8), 4–23.
Ellram, L. M. (2000). Purchasing and Supply Management's Participation in the Target Costing Process. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36(2), 39–51.
Ellram, L. M., & Siferd, S. P. (1998). Total cost of ownership: a key concept in strategic cost management decisions. Jorunal of Businnes Logistics, 19(1), 55–84.
Eriksson, P. E., & Pesämaa, O. (2013). Buyer-supplier integration in project-based industries. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 28(1), 29–40.
Flanagan, R., Kendell, A., Norman, G. [G.], & Robinson, G. D. (1987). Life cycle costing and risk management. Construction Management and Economics. (5), 53–71.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2007). Policy and Planning for Large-Infrastructure Projects: Problems, Causes, Cures. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(4), 578–597.
Gluch, P., & Baumann, H. (2004). The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making. Building and Environment, 39(5), 571–580.
Goh, Y. M., Newnes, L. B., Mileham, A. R., McMahon, C. A., & Saravi, M. E. (2010). Uncertainty in Through-Life Costing–-Review and Perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 57(4), 689–701.
Guarnieri, P., & Gomes, R. C. (2019). Can public procurement be strategic? A future agenda proposition. Journal of Public Procurement, 295–321.
Holma, A.M., Østensen, M. W., Holmen, E., & Boer, L. de (2022). Market dialogue in public procurement: Buyer-supplier interfaces and relational abilities. Industrial Marketing Management, 104, 51–67.
Adams, K.T., Osmani, M., Thrope, T. and Thornback, J., 2017. Circular economy in construction: Current awareness, challenges and enablers. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management, 170(1), pp. 15-24.
Building Sustainably How A Quantity Surveyor Can Help (2013) [Online] Available from:
Cartlidge, Duncan (2011) Sustainability, Assessment and Quantity Surveying Practice. In: Rohinton Emmanuel. New Aspects of Quantity Surveying Practice. 3rded. Taylor and Francis, Chapter 8.
Centre for Worldwide Sustainable Construction https://cwsc.epfl.ch/about-us/research/
Chamikara, P.B.S., Perera, B.A.K.S. and Rodrigo, M.N.N., 2020. Competencies of the quantity surveyor in performing for sustainable construction. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(3), pp. 237-251.
Chandramohan, A., Perera, B.A.K.S. and Dewagoda, K.G., 2020. Diversification of professional quantity surveyors’ roles in the construction industry: The skills and competencies required. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(7), pp.
-1381.
GlobalABC (2019), Adopting Decarbonisation Policies in the Buildings and Construction Sector: Costs and Benefits. https://globalabc.org/sites/default/files/2020- 06/GlobalABC%20Adopting%20Decarbonization%20Policies.pdf
Global ABC. (2023). Buildings Breakthrough: “near-zero emission and resilient buildings are the new normal by 2030”. Retrieved October 2024, from Buildings Breakthrough: https://globalabc.org/buildings-breakthrough
Howard, N. (2015) A Bigger Role for the QS? – Cost + Environment Impact In: Proceedings of the HKIS and AIQS Joint Conference – How QS Will Succeed in Tomorrow’s World, Nov 2015, HK: pp 36 -40.
Ma, T and Luu, H.T. (2013) The Changing Role of Quantity Surveyors in the Green Building Development in South Australia, School of Natural & Built Environments, University of South Australia.
SIGMA (2016), Incorporating Environmental Considerations into Procurement, Brief 13, OECD Publishing, Paris
SIGMA (2016), Incorporating Social Considerations into Procurement, Brief 14, OECD Publishing, Paris
Seah, E. (2009) Sustainable Construction and the Impact on the Quantity Surveyor, 13th Pacific Association of Quantity Surveyors Congress.
Sell, C. (2007) Defining the future: what does sustainable development mean to the construction industry? www.arabianbusiness.com [accessed 6 June 2008].
Sodagar, B. and Fieldson, R. (2011) Towards a Sustainable Construction Practice, Construction Information Quarterly (CIQ), Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB), Construction Paper 232, Vol. 10, Issue 3, pp. 101 - 108.
Karttunen, E., Matela, M., Hallikas, J., & Immonen, M. (2022). Public procurement as an attractive customer: a supplier perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 42(13), 79–102.
Khattak, M. S., & Mustafa, U. (2019). Management competencies, complexities and performance in engineering infrastructure projects of Pakistan. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(7), 1321–1347.
Malacina, I., Karttunen, E., Jääskeläinen, A., Lintukangas, K., Heikkilä, J., & Kähkönen, A.K. (2022). Capturing the value creation in public procurement: A practice-based view. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 28(2), 100745.
