Techno-Legal Governance and Algorithmic Management: AStrategic Framework for Re-engineering Public Administration in Viksit Bharat@2047

Authors

  • Arbind Kumar Modi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37591/njcbl.v9i1.1852

Keywords:

Viksit Bharat@2047, Digital Public Infrastructure, Algorithmic Management, Techno- Legal Governance, VB-G RAM G Act, Sovereign AI, India Stack.

Abstract

This empirical study investigates the structural transformation of the Indian public sector as it moves toward the strategic milestone of Viksit Bharat@2047. Aiming for a $30 trillion to $34.7 trillion economy by the centenary of its independence, India is currently undergoing a shift from legacy 19th- century administrative hierarchies to an agile "Algorithmic State." This research utilizes a cross- sectional multi-domain sample (N= 400) across Legal, Administrative, Management, and Policy sectors (n = 100 each). Using the updated "Viksit Governance Readiness Scale" (VGRS), the study evaluates the "Techno-Legal-Management" (TLM) triad. A pivotal focus is the newly enacted Viksit Bharat-Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, 2025 (VB-G RAM G Act), which replaces MGNREGA with a technology-driven 125-day employment guarantee. Findings reveal high digital adoption in the Banking, Financial Services, and Insurance (BFSI) sector at 68%, but identify a "Trust Gap" in the judiciary, where a backlog of over 50 million cases exists. The research validates two primary hypotheses: that high digital literacy mediates a reduction in perceived legal risk (H1) and that management experts prioritize operational efficiency (ROI reaching 200% in finance) over the
"Slow Justice" norms of the legal domain (H2). The report integrates the January 2026 Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser (OPSA) White Paper on Techno-Legal Frameworks, providing a diagnostic roadmap for India to lead in "Sovereign AI" and digital ethics.

References

Arora M, Mittal A, Dhankar N. Do algorithmically managed employees feel objectified and isolated? Int J Organ Anal. 2025. doi:10.1108/IJOA-03-2025-5287.

Boston Consulting Group (BCG). Unlocking the potential of AI in India. 2025.

Central European Public Administration Review. Aims and scope: IMRaD requirements for public administration. 2026.

Chillar N, Sharma K, Arora S. Exploring the role of digital financial literacy and well-being. Acta Psychol. 2025;259.

Global Partnership on AI (GPAI). Algorithmic transparency in the public sector. 2024.

Gurramkonda B. Assessing the digital readiness of pre-service teachers. Vernon Press; 2025.

Jharkhand Assembly. Resolution against VB-G RAM G Act. Times of India. 2026 Mar 18.

KPMG India. Top 10 priorities for India's next growth phase. 2026.

Ministry of Finance. Economic Survey 2025–26. Government of India; 2026.

Ministry of Law and Justice. The Viksit Bharat-Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, 2025 (No. 36 of 2025). 2025.

Mukhtar Y, Farooqui A. Justice in the digital era: A tool or a threat? Int J Law Policy. 2025.

NITI Aayog. Scenarios towards Viksit Bharat and net zero. Vol. 1. Government of India; 2026.

OECD. Algorithmic management in the workplace: New evidence. OECD AI Papers; 2025.

Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser (OPSA). Strengthening AI governance through techno- legal framework. Government of India; 2026.

Press Information Bureau (PIB). DPI and Aadhaar: Social inclusion and privacy safeguards. 2026 Mar 20.

Sahoo S, Chhawacharia A. Dial E for ethical enforcement: Institutional veto power. AI Gov Rev. 2025.

Shinde S. Predictive HR analytics and employee attrition modelling. Res Rev. 2025.

Strategic Market Research. Global smart contracts market forecast 2024–2030. 2025.

United Nations DESA. United Nations e-government survey 2024. United Nations; 2024.

Yuniawan A. Determinants of artificial intelligence adoption in financial services. Int J Inf Manage. 2025.

Bozeman B, Feeney MK. Rules and red tape: A prism for public administration. 2014.

Hood C. A public management for all seasons? Public Adm. 1991.

Perry JL, Wise LR. The motivational bases of public service. Public Adm Rev. 1990.

Rainey HG, Steinbauer P. Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. J Public Adm Res Theory. 1999.

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Modi, A. K. . (2026). Techno-Legal Governance and Algorithmic Management: AStrategic Framework for Re-engineering Public Administration in Viksit Bharat@2047. NOLEGEIN-Journal of Corporate &Amp; Business Laws, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.37591/njcbl.v9i1.1852