Digital Platform Preferences and Engagement Patterns in Semi-Rural Karnataka: A Study
Keywords:
digital marketing, digital platform, language preference, digital content preference, communication channel, rural schools, semi-urban.Abstract
Digital marketing has already entered the education sector due to the proliferation of internet access and mobile technology, which offer scalable, cost-effective and targeted means of communication. As the internet is widely and easily available in rural areas, educational institutions can leverage digital marketing there as well. Objectives: The current study examines the digital platform preferences & engagements of SSLC/ 10th students studying in rural and semi-urban areas. Try to determine their preferred digital platform, the type of digital content they prefer, their linguistic comfort level on digital platforms, and the communication channel they commonly use, so the insights can be applied to digital marketing. Methodology: Purposive Sampling with Full Enumeration (Census) for School Students, and statistical crosstabulation is conducted across three schools having different management/financing types, affiliation boards and medium of instruction. Results & Analysis: Most students revealed that YouTube and WhatsApp are their go-to digital platforms, with Google Search close behind. Students are most drawn to videos, followed by testimonials and infographics. Around 89.61% stressed the importance of regional languages, saying they feel more comfortable when content is presented in Kannada. Conclusion: Digital marketing in education can be effectively implemented in rural areas considering the insights from the target audience.
References
Chaffey, D. (2015). Digital marketing: Strategy, implementation and practice (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
Constantinides, E., & Zinck Stagno, M. C. (2011). Potential of the web as a marketing tool for universities: A segmented student approach. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 21(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2011.573592
Dutta, S. (2018). Commercialization of education system in India: A close outlook to teachers’ and students’ perspective. International Journal of Research, 5(4). https://edupediapublications.org/journals
Karpov, Alexander. (2013). The Commodification of Education. Russian Education & Society. 55. 75-90. 10.2753/RES1060 9393550506.
Nair, K. V. R. (2022). An analytical study on the digital marketing practices adopted at higher education institutions [Ph.D. thesis, Presidency University, Karnataka]. Shodhganga@INFLIBNET. http://hdl.handle.net/10603/454759
Pulizzi, J. (2012). Get content get customers: Turn prospects into buyers with content marketing. McGraw-Hill.
Schultz, D. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Lauterborn, R. F. (1993). Integrated marketing communications. NTC Business Books.
Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Mazzarol, T. (2014). Factors influencing word of mouth effectiveness: Receiver perspectives. European Journal of Marketing, 48(1/2), 336–359. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2011-0771
Ryan, D. (2016). Understanding digital marketing: Marketing strategies for engaging the digital generation (4th ed.). Kogan Page.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
