Analyzing Ethical Leadership: Implications for Equitable Career Advancement of Female Managers in Female-Led Workplaces
Abstract
This research paper delves into the exploration of ethical leadership and its implications for fair career progression of female managers in female-dominated workplaces. The paper emphasizes the correlation between ethical leadership and gender parity in career advancement, drawing on a variety of theoretical perspectives and empirical studies. This inquiry aims to probe the influence of ethical leadership on career development trajectories of female managers in organizations steered by women leaders. The hypothesis posits that adherence to ethical leadership principles engenders an atmosphere that nurtures fair and equal career growth possibilities for women in managerial positions. This research paper seeks to explore the relationship between ethical leadership and the career progression of female managers in workplaces directed by female leaders. The study hypothesizes that ethical leadership practices can create an environment conducive to fair and equal career growth opportunities for female managers. The scholarly examination endeavors to critically dissect the concept of ethical leadership, and its ramifications for the equitable career progression of female managers operating within female-centric workplaces. With a spotlight on the nuanced correlation between ethical leadership practices and the achievement of gender parity in career ascension, the study leverages diverse theoretical frameworks and scrutinizes a plethora of empirical evidence. The central objective is to contribute a nuanced understanding of how ethical leadership can cultivate an environment conducive to equal career advancement opportunities, particularly in a workplace environment predominantly influenced by female leadership.
References
Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422.
Bass, B. M., &Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Eagly, A. H., &Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.
Morrison, A. M., White, R. P., &Velsor, E. V. (1987). Breaking the glass ceiling: Can women reach the top of America's largest corporations. Addison-Wesley.
Thirgood S, Redpath S, Newton I, Hudson P. Raptors and red grouse: conservation conflicts and management solutions. Conservation Biology. 2000 Feb;14(1):95–104.
Dalton DR, Dalton CM. Integration of micro and macro studies in governance research: CEO duality, board composition, and financial performance. Journal of management. 2011 Mar;37(2):404–11.
Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., &Neubaum, D. O. (2005). The effect of leader moral development on ethical climate and employee attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 135–151.
Vinkenburg, C. J., van Engen, M. L., 2, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2011). An exploration of stereotypical beliefs about leadership styles: Is transformational leadership a route to women’s promotion? The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 10–21
