Perspectives of Men Towards Feminism: A Case Study of an Educational Institute
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37591/njhrmd.v9i1.1803Keywords:
Case study, educational institute, feminism, gender equality, men, perspectivesAbstract
In contemporary society, discussions surrounding feminism have increasingly been accompanied by debates over its perceived misrepresentation and alleged misuse, often labeled as “pseudo” or “fake” feminism. Such narratives have contributed to confusion, particularly among men, and in some instances have diverted attention from women who require genuine gender-just support and empowerment. Within this context, the present study examines men’s perceptions and interpretations of feminism in an educational institutional setting. The research seeks to explore how men define feminism, the extent to which they incorporate feminist principles into their everyday interactions, and the influence of socio-cultural backgrounds on their attitudes and beliefs. Adopting a case study approach, the study collected data from 30 male participants aged 18 to 45 years using a self-designed interview schedule. A mixed-methods framework was employed, combining quantitative analysis to identify general trends with qualitative insights to capture personal viewpoints and lived experiences. The findings indicate that most respondents support the ideas of gender equality and women’s empowerment; however, their understanding of feminism remains fragmented and is often shaped by prevailing social norms, cultural conditioning, media narratives, and individual experiences. The study
further reveals that men’s engagement with feminist ideas is neither uniform nor simplistic, but rather layered and context-dependent. These results highlight the importance of structured gender- sensitization initiatives within educational institutions to promote informed, inclusive, and balanced understandings of feminism. Strengthening dialogue and awareness in such spaces can contribute to more constructive male participation in advancing gender equity and social justice.
References
Bergh, L. F., & Zander, L. F. Male allies in feminist movements: Strategies for supporting gender equity. Journal of Gender Studies, (2019). 28(3), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2019.1581736
Connell, R. W. Masculinities. University of California Press (1995)..
Cooper, A. K., & White, S. L. The role of higher education in shaping male students’ attitudes towards gender equality. Gender and Education, (2016).28(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1060349
Dempster, T., & Loughnan, M. Gender studies in higher education: The role of curriculum in shaping feminist perspectives. Studies in Higher Education, (2014) 39(2), 325-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.819213
Flood, M. Men’s involvement in gender equality: Reflection and analysis of positive masculinity. Journal of Men and Masculinities, (2011). 12(3), 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X11411319
Hooks, b. Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. South End Press ( 2000)..
Johnson, M. The socialization of men: How cultural expectations shape masculine identities. Journal of Social Issues, (2014). 70(4), 678-688. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12087
Kilmartin, C. Men’s health and masculinity: Reworking gender norms for greater equity. American Journal of Men’s Health, (2015). 9(1), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988314560876
Kimmel, M. S. The gendered society. Oxford University Press. (2000).
Lamb, S. The role of education in fostering feminist perspectives among male students. Educational Review, (2009). 61(2), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910902728235
MacKinnon, C. A. Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Harvard University Press. (1987).
O’Neil, J. M. The gender role conflict scale: A revalidation study. Journal of Men and Masculinities, (2008).10(3), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X08322210
Simes, R., Cavanaugh, M., & Levine, A. Men and feminism: Understanding the gap in male engagement. Psychology of Women Quarterly, . (2017). 41(4), 517-530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317709473
