Examining the Effect of a Four-Day Work Week on Employee Performance
Keywords:
Four-Day Work Week, Employee Performance, Employee Productivity, Job Satisfaction, Work-Life Balance, Employee Well-Being, Employee Engagement, Flexible Working Arrangements, Organisational Performance, Workplace Flexibility.Abstract
The impact of a four-day work week on employee performance, productivity, job satisfaction, motivation, and work-life balance is examined in this study. Organisations are increasingly exploring flexible working arrangements because of growing concerns regarding employee well- being, workplace stress, burnout, and the changing nature of work. A four-day work week generally involves reducing the number of working days while maintaining employee pay, although the exact implementation may differ across organisations. Previous workplace trials have reported improvements in work-life balance, employee well-being, job satisfaction, and productivity under appropriate conditions. The present study adopts a descriptive research design and uses both primary and secondary sources of data. Primary data were collected through a structured questionnaire from 100 employees working in different organisations. Secondary data were obtained from research articles, books, reports, and publications related to flexible working arrangements and employee performance. The questionnaire used a five-point Likert scale to assess employee perceptions regarding productivity, work-life balance, stress, motivation, job satisfaction, organisational commitment, and performance. The analysis indicates that a majority of respondents perceive the four-day work week positively. The findings suggest that a four-day work week may improve employee productivity, work-life balance, motivation, job satisfaction, and overall well-being. However, challenges related to workload management, communication, deadlines, customer service, and coordination may affect 3 successful implementation. The study concludes that a four-day work week can be an effective workplace strategy when supported by appropriate planning, workload redistribution, employee participation, and management support.
References
1. Haar JM, Grant D, Delaney H, et al. Four-day week trial: employee experiences and organisational outcomes. Auckland: University of Auckland Business School; 2018. (Trustpilot)
2. Perpetual Guardian. The four day week is here: productivity and flexibility policy. Auckland: Perpetual Guardian; 2019. (Perpetual Guardian)
3. Schor JB, Fan W, Kelly O, Gu G, et al. The Four Day Week: employee health and well- being outcomes.
4 Day Week Global Research Report; 2022. (4 Day Week Global) 4. Herzberg F, Mausner B, Snyderman BB. The motivation to work. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 1959.
5. Karasek RA. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q. 1979;24(2):285-308.
6. Autonomy. The impact of reduced working hours on employee productivity and well-being. London: Autonomy; 2023.
7. Microsoft Japan. Work-Life Choice Challenge Summer 2019: results report. Tokyo: Microsoft Japan; 2019.
8. Kalleberg AL. Good jobs, bad jobs: the rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2011.
9. Pfeffer J. Dying for a paycheck: how modern management harms employee health and company performance—and what we can do about it. New York: HarperBusiness; 2018.
10. International Labour Organization. Working time and work-life balance around the world. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2023.
