Internal Assessment of Rivers State University in Achieving Threshold, Distinctive, and Dynamic Educational and Business Capabilities

Authors

  • Amadi Alolote
  • Amieye Dapiriteye Ibim

Abstract

Scanning an organization’s internal environment is necessary to identify strengths (internal capabilities/competencies) to be built on; weaknesses to be overcome; and potential external linkages, relevant to support. An internal assessment of Rivers State University was carried out via a resource audit, which entailed a survey/evaluation of available resources/competencies as well as deficiencies as a business entity. The internal assessment shows that Rivers State University possesses several core threshold resources and competencies. There are several functional building infrastructures, unique Science and Technology programs/research institutes/partnerships, extensive land coverage, and ICT competence. There are also several human resource competencies, which reinforce core threshold capabilities. This includes robust staff-facing activities with a strong emphasis placed on academic staff enhancement and highly regulated student-facing activities. This is further complemented by a renewed drive towards corporate entrepreneurship, with employability and research initiatives drawn in partnership with key industries in the region. RSU’s ability to proactively exploit external linkages and political links for internal support confers distinctive capabilities. RSU must however continue to exercise forward-thinking relevant to sustain such distinctive capabilities which should be underpinned by demand-driven institutional and organic responses that are in sync with its immediate environment. 

References

Johnson G, Whittington R, Scholes K, Angwin D, Regner P. Exploring strategy (10. utg.). Harlow: Pearson; 2014

Hooley GJ, Piercy N, Nicoulaud B. Marketing strategy and competitive positioning. Pearson Education; 2008.

Ansoff HI, Kipley D, Lewis AO, Helm-Stevens R, Ansoff R. Implanting strategic management. Springer; 2018 Oct 26.

Farooq A, Hussain Z. Balanced scorecard perspective on change and performance: a study of selected Indian companies. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci. 2011 Jan 1; 24: 754–68.

Lynch R. Towards an innovation link between dynamic capabilities and sustainability strategy: options for emerging market companies. Int J Innov Technol Manag. 2019 Jun 29; 16(04): 1940003.

Blackmore J, Bateman D, O’Mara J, Loughlin J. Centre for Research in Educational Futures and Innovation.

Navarro JR, Gallardo FO. A model of strategic change: Universities and dynamic capabilities. High Educ Policy. 2003 Jun 1; 16: 199–212.

Goolnik G. Effective change management strategies for embedding online learning within higher education and enabling the effective continuing professional development of its academic staff. Turkish Online J Distance Educ. 2006 Jan 1; 7(1): 9–21.

Ellis A, Phelps R. Staff development for online delivery: A collaborative, team based action learning model. Australas J Educ Technol. 2000 May 8; 16(1): 26–44.

Parakhina V, Godina O, Boris O, Ushvitsky L. Strategic management in universities as a factor of their global competitiveness. Int J Educ Manag. 2017 Jan 9; 31(1): 62–75.

Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J. 1997 Aug; 18(7): 509–33

Published

2023-05-16

How to Cite

Amadi Alolote, & Amieye Dapiriteye Ibim. (2023). Internal Assessment of Rivers State University in Achieving Threshold, Distinctive, and Dynamic Educational and Business Capabilities. Nolegein - Journal of Organizational Behavior and Management, 5(2), 20–27. Retrieved from https://mbajournals.in/index.php/JoOBM/article/view/1041