Methods and Strategies for Fostering Self-directed Learning in the Target Language Acquisition
Keywords:
Learner autonomy, self-instruction, language acquisition, blended learning, phygital learning constructivism, experiential learning, intrinsic motivation, learner potential, humanismAbstract
Fostering learner autonomy has become the topic of virulent discussion among practitioners,
educators, policy makers and administrators for the last three to four decades. The study named
“Methods and Strategies for Fostering Self-directed Learning in the Target Language Acquisition”
discusses the importance of learner autonomy in the backdrop of different learning theories. This
study intends to examine different definitions given to learner autonomy and their multifarious
implications. Definitions of Holec, Benson etc. are discussed. In addition to that discussion, the study
aims at various ways of fostering learner autonomy in English language learning methods and
strategies among plus two students. The study also focuses on different learning theories based on
which the development of learner autonomy in L2 acquisition. Over the last three to four decades,
discussion on learner autonomy has gathered momentum as it is envisaged to enhance the learners’
interest for English language acquisition and foster motivation to lifelong learning. That is why the
topic has become important for teachers and researchers. The study also discusses the meaning and
methods of learner autonomy in the first part and then in the second part it focuses on the ways and
approaches to foster learner autonomy in English language learning. Different modern theories of
learning like The Theory of Constructivism, The Social Cognitive Theory, Humanism, Experiential
Learning Theory etc. are also considered to study how they would foster learner autonomy.
References
Holec H. Autonomy of foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamum; 1981.
Benson P. Learner autonomy. TESOL Q. 2013; 47(4): 839–843.
Volley P. Does the teacher have a role in autonomous language learning? In: Benson P, Voller P,
editors. Autonomy and independence in language learning. London: Longman; 1997; 98–113.
Dickinson L, Wenden A. Autonomy, Self-direction and self-access in language teaching and
learning: The History of an idea. System (Special Issue). 1995; 23(2): 151–164.
Bandura A. Social foundation of thought and action: Social Cognitive Theory. Eaglewood cliffs,
NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Unpublished manuscript. USA: Stanford
university; 2001.
Carr PB. The measurement of resourcefulness intentions in the adult autonomous learner.
Doctoral dissertation. The George Washington university; 1999. Diss Abstr Int. 1999; 60: 3849.
Ponton MK, Rhea NE. Autonomous learning from a social cognitive perspective. New Horizons
in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. 2006; 20(2): 38–49.
http://education.five.edu/new horizons.
Ponton MK, Derrick MG, Carr PB. The relationship between resourcefulness and persistence in
adult autonomous learning. Adult Educ Q. 2005; 55(2): 116–128.
Derrick MG. The measurement of an adult’s intention to exhibit persistence in autonomous
learning. Doctoral dissertation. The George Washington university; 2001. Diss Abstr Int. 2001;
: 2533.
Maslow AH. A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev. 1943; 50(4): 370–396.
Montessori M, Carter B. The Secret of Childhood. Calcutta: Orient Longmans; 1936.
Montessori M. To Educate the Human Potential. UK: Ravenio Books; 2015.
